Skip to content Skip to sidebar Skip to footer
Página inicial / After the Amanuscript Traking Sysyem Shows Reviews Completed It Says Under Revew Again

After the Amanuscript Traking Sysyem Shows Reviews Completed It Says Under Revew Again

Postar um comentário

Instructions for authors

Table of contents

  1. Full general
  2. Submission of a manuscript
  3. Organization of full-length research papers [+].
    • Title page
    • Abstract
    • Keywords
    • Abbreviations
    • Background
    • Methods
    • Results
    • Give-and-take
    • Limitations
    • Conclusions
    • What is already known on this topic
    • What this study adds
    • Acknowledgements
    • Competing interest
    • Authors contributions (authorship and contributorship)
    • References
    • Tables
    • Figures
    • Supplementary material/Appendices (if whatever)
  4. Case reports
  5. Case serial
  6. Images in clinical medicine
  7. Short communications
  8. Reviews
  9. Letters to the Editors
  10. Commentaries
  11. Essays
  12. Case report
  13. Debate papers
  14. Briefs
  15. Editorial
  16. Opinion
  17. Media spotter
  18. Perspective
  19. Obituaries
  20. Outbreak investigation reports
  21. Supplements, conference proceedings and workshop reports
  22. Revised manuscripts
  23. Proofs
  24. Permissions
  25. Copyright
  26. Online submission
  27. Article Processing Charges
  28. PAMJ peer review procedure
  29. PAMJ tape retention policy
  30. PAMJ correction policy
  31. Retraction policy
  32. Permanent archiving of content
  33. Publication and peer review processes
  34. Plagiarism check
  35. Authors conflicts and complaints resolution
  36. PAMJ Research Ethics Policy

1. General

Aim: The PAMJ Clinical Medicine was created to highlight the rich output of clinical practice accross Africa. Telescopic: We publish clinical example reports, example series, images, reviews, commentary, opinions and research manufactures from the broad spectrum of clinical medicine and clinical inquiry.

PAMJ is an online open access peer-reviewed journal focusing on clinical medicine. Authors are encouraged to submit original research, systematic review and short reports from the field of clinical medicine.
Prior to submit your first article, you lot should use for a user name and countersign. PAMJ offers a user friendly procedure for online submission through the PAMJ Manuscript Hut ™.

Short reports volition include instance report, commentary, conference proceedings, editorials, viewpoints, and letter of the alphabet to the editors. Short Communications should exist no longer than 1500 words. They must take an abstract and references, but the chief body of the text does not take to follow the original research´southward format. We requite privilege to invited reviews and encourage prospective authors of systematic reviews to talk over the project with the editorial part before development.

Manuscripts will be initially screened by an editor for adherence to the journal´s instructions or identification of gross deficiencies. At this stage, the respective writer tin be contacted by the editorial role for clarification or the manuscript can be rejected. Once this initial screening is completed, manuscripts are sent to two-iii referees; if appropriate, a statistical reviewer is involved. On boilerplate, we will report back to authors within six weeks with a start decision. Authors should however note that the average duration from submission to publication is roughly 3 months (one - 6 months). We encourage authors not to contact the editorial role less than 6 weeks subsequently the initial submission. We discourage and will ignore requests by authors to speed up the publication process for a particular manuscript.

Manuscripts must be submitted by 1 of the authors of the manuscript, and should not exist submitted past anyone on their behalf. The submitting author takes responsibleness for the article during submission and peer review.

Languages of publication are English and French. All manuscripts in French should include an English language translation of the title, abstract and keywords. Poor English of French practice not prevent acceptance provided the paper's content is of high scientific quality; we still strongly encourage authors to accept their manuscript reviewed by a fluent English language speaker and writer to amend its language contents prior to submission. All accepted manuscripts are re-create-edited.

To facilitate rapid publication and to minimize administrative costs, PAMJ journals accepts only online submission. The submission procedure is compatible with all the latest browsers. Ensure that javascript is enable in your browser.

Files tin can exist submitted as a batch. The submission process allows the authors to interrupt it at any time, and go along where they left off at their return on the site.

During submission you lot will be asked to provide a comprehend letter. Use this to explain why your manuscript should exist published in the journal and to elaborate on any bug relating to our editorial policies detailed in the instructions for authors.

Assistance with the process of manuscript preparation and submission is bachelor from the customer support team (services@panafrican-med-journal.com). Nosotros also provide a drove of links to useful tools and resource for scientific authors, on our resources for authors page.

PAMJ content licensing: Manufactures published in PAMJ Journals are Open Access and distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International (CC Past four.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in whatever medium, provided the original work is properly cited..

2. Submission of a newspaper

Online submission
PAMJ Journals only accept online submissions. Click here to access the Online Manuscript Submission System. Simple onscreen instructions are provided. If you experience problems with the online submission system, send an email to editor@panafrican-med-journal.com. Do non send your manuscript to that electronic mail accost, it volition exist ignored.

Conflicts of interest
Volition be mentioned in the manuscript as "Authors declared they have no conflicts of interest".

3. Organization of a full-length inquiry paper.

Download the periodical manuscript template to help you format your manuscript.

Maximum length: 4000 words in primary text (i.e., excluding abstract, references, legends, tables and figures), 4 tables/figures maximum, and a structured abstract of 250 words plus upward to fifty references.

Title page - This folio should states: a) The championship of the paper (include the study design if appropriate; for example: A versus B in the treatment of C: a randomized controlled trial; X is a chance factor for Y: a case command written report), b) Authors names (total proper noun - no qualification, no abbreviations). Strictly follow this order: First Proper name, Eye proper name (if ever), Last Proper name. E.g.: Paul Kevin Akuna), c) institution(south) of origin, d) Corresponding author plus his/her accost, telephone and fax number, e-mail address, e) Word count (for both abstract and the main text)

Abstract - The abstract of the manuscript should not exceed 250 words and must be structured into separate sections: Background: the context and purpose of the report; Methods: how the study was performed and statistical tests used; Results: the main findings; Conclusion: brief summary and potential implications. Please minimize the utilize of abbreviations and do non cite references in the abstract.

Keywords. Upward to ten keywords should be provided at the end of the Abstract. The keywords should be Medical Subject Headings (MeSH®) Terms. Use the MeSH on Deman Tool to assistance propose keywords.
Abbreviations a list of abbreviations is not accepted. Define abbreviations the first fourth dimension they are used in the text and utilise them thereafter. No abbreviations in the abstruse except for vary know ones.

Background The groundwork section should be written from the standpoint of researchers without specialist knowledge in that expanse and must clearly state - and, if helpful, illustrate - the background to the research and its aims. Reports of clinical research should, where appropriate, include a summary of a search of the literature to indicate why this study was necessary and what it aimed to contribute to the field. The section should cease with a very brief statement of what is being reported in the article.

Methods Sufficient information should exist given to permit repetition of the experimental work. This should include the design of the study, the setting, the type of participants or materials involved, a articulate description of all interventions and comparisons, and the type of analysis used, including a power calculation if appropriate.

Results - The Results should be stated concisely without discussion and should not usually comprise whatsoever references. The same information should not exist presented in figures and tables. Do not repeat all the data that is ready out in the tables or figures in the text; emphasize or summarize only of import observations.

Discussion - The Discussion should bargain with the interpretation of the results and non restate them. We encourage authors to write their Discussion in a structured way, as follows:a) statement of principal findings; b) strengths and weaknesses of the study; c) strengths and weaknesses in relation to other studies; d) discussion of important differences in results; e) significant of the study; f) unanswered questions and hereafter enquiry.

Limitations - Always aknowledge the potential the limitations of your study that and how they impact or influence the interpretation of the findings from your research, the generalizability, applications to practice, and/or utility of findings.

Determination - The conclusion should provide a brief summarize of the cardinal findings, potential implications and the way forward.

What is already known on this topic: include a maximum of 03 bullet points on what is already known on this topic.

What this study adds: include a maximum of 03 bullet points on what your study adds.

Acknowledgements - Please admit anyone who contributed towards the written report by making substantial contributions to conception, design, conquering of data, or assay and interpretation of data, or who was involved in drafting the manuscript or revising it critically for important intellectual content, but who does not encounter the criteria for authorship. Please also include their source(south) of funding. Please also admit anyone who contributed materials essential for the study. The role of a medical writer must be included in the acknowledgements section, including their source(s) of funding. Authors should obtain permission to admit from all those mentioned in the Acknowledgements. Delight list the source(southward) of funding for the written report, for each writer, and for the manuscript preparation in the acknowledgements section. Authors must describe the role of the funding body, if any, in report design; in the collection, analysis, and estimation of data; in the writing of the manuscript; and in the decision to submit the manuscript for publication.

Competing interest - Authors are responsible for recognizing and disclosing conflicts of interest that might bias their piece of work. They should acknowledge in the manuscript all financial back up for the work and other personal connections. Authors are required to complete a announcement of competing interests. All competing interests that are alleged will be listed at the cease of published manufactures. Where an author gives no competing interests, the listing volition read 'The writer(south) declare that they have no competing interests'. When completing your announcement, delight consider the post-obit questions:

Fiscal competing interests

  • In the past five years take you received reimbursements, fees, funding, or salary from an arrangement that may in any mode gain or lose financially from the publication of this manuscript, either at present or in the future? Is such an organization financing this manuscript (including the article-processing charge)? If and so, delight specify.
  • Do you hold any stocks or shares in an system that may in whatsoever fashion gain or lose financially from the publication of this manuscript, either now or in the hereafter? If and then, delight specify
  • Practise you agree or are you currently applying for any patents relating to the content of the manuscript? Take you received reimbursements, fees, funding, or salary from an organisation that holds or has applied for patents relating to the content of the manuscript? If and so, please specify.
  • Do yous accept any other fiscal competing interests? If and then, please specify.

Not-financial competing interests

  • Are at that place whatever non-financial competing interests (political, personal, religious, ideological, academic, intellectual, commercial or whatsoever other) to declare in relation to this manuscript? If so, please specify.
  • If yous are unsure as to whether you, or one your co-authors, has a competing interest please discuss information technology with the editorial office.

Authors' contributions - In guild to requite appropriate credit to each author of a paper, the individual contributions of authors to the manuscript should be specified in this section. The Uniform Requirements for Manuscripts Submitted to Biomedical Journals (URM) of the International Committee of Medical Journal Editors (ICJME) recommends the post-obit criteria for authorship (Learn more about the URM on Authorship and Contributorship):

  • Authorship credit should be based on i) substantial contributions to formulation and design, acquisition of data, or analysis and estimation of information; 2) drafting the article or revising it critically for of import intellectual content; and three) final blessing of the version to be published. Authors should come across conditions 1, 2, and 3.
  • When a large, multicenter group has conducted the work, the grouping should place the individuals who accept straight responsibility for the manuscript (iii). These individuals should fully run across the criteria for authorship/contributorship divers to a higher place, and editors will ask these individuals to complete journal-specific author and conflict-of-interest disclosure forms. When submitting a manuscript authored by a group, the corresponding writer should clearly indicate the preferred citation and identify all private authors besides every bit the grouping name. Journals generally list other members of the group in the Acknowledgments. The NLM indexes the group proper name and the names of individuals the grouping has identified every bit being directly responsible for the manuscript; information technology as well lists the names of collaborators if they are listed in Acknowledgments.
  • Acquisition of funding, collection of information, or general supervision of the research group alone does not establish authorship.
  • All persons designated every bit authors should authorize for authorship, and all those who qualify should be listed.
  • Each author should have participated sufficiently in the piece of work to take public responsibility for advisable portions of the content.

References - References must be numbered consecutively, in square brackets (like this [i], or this [2,three] or even this [4-7]), in the lodge in which they are cited in the text, followed past any in tables or legends. Reference citations should not appear in titles or headings. Each reference must have an individual reference number. Preferably, limit the number of references to fifty. If automatic numbering systems are used, the reference numbers must be finalized and the bibliography must exist fully formatted before submission. We encourage authors to use a recent version of EndNote (version 5 and above) or Reference Manager when formatting their reference list, as this allows references to be automatically extracted. Examples of the PAMJ reference style are shown below. Please accept care to follow the reference mode precisely; references not in the right style may be retyped, necessitating tedious proofreading.

We strongly abet the use of Zotero, a free and open source reference management software which is a very good culling to expensive software like Reference Manager or EndNote.

  • Download output fashion (PAMJ.os) for Reference Managing director.
  • Download output style (PAMJ.ens) for EndNote.
  • Download output way (PAMJ.csl)) for Zotero.

Manuscripts not formatted according to the PAMJ mode will be returned to the authors . An example is provided below (note the use of the dot after the author listing, the title, the journal and the date).

  1. Kirikou Thomas, Doe JA, Shaba KV, Kashawa Tuma. A sample of the PAMJ reference style equally shown on the journal website. J Hist Fant. 2006; 76(11):204-212
  2. Kirikou Thomas, Doe JA, Shaba Kevin, Kashawa TB. Another sample of the PAMJ reference manner: equally shown on the journal website. J Hist Fant. 2006; 76(12):212-228
  3. Kirikou TA, Doe John, Shaba KV, Kashawa TB. Another sample of the PAMJ reference mode: as shown on the periodical website. J Hist Fant. 2006; 76:212-228

Formatting book references: Apply the format below to reference a book
Author of the book. Title of the volume. Year of publication. Publisher Location. Publisher name
Example: Fleiss JL. Statistical methods for rates and proportions - 3rd edition. 2003. Hoboken. J Wiley
NB: Note the use of dots to dissever the sections of the volume reference.

Formatting web references: Use the format below to reference a web folio or a web site
Author of the page. Proper name of the source (if any). Yr of data. url. Appointment link accessed
Instance: SAS Establish. SAS ix. http://support.sas.com/software/index.htm. Accessed 10 April 2005
NB: Note the utilize of dots to separate the sections of the spider web reference.

Supplementary material/Appendices (if whatever) - Submit any supplementary material to the editorial role bye email. The editorial office tin can also decide which material will be published every bit supplemental textile.

Tables (if any) - General instructions for tables.

  • Append tables at the end of your manuscript, after the reference section
  • Maximum 3 tables per manufactures. If more than tables are required, information technology will have to be justified
  • Each table should fit on one page. No table overlapping over several pages. So no matter the size of the tabular array, brand certain information technology tin comfortably fit on a unmarried page (portrait or mural)
  • Elements within the table should be contained within cells.

Download samples of correctly formatted tables (Microsoft Give-and-take 2002-2003, *.Dr.): Table 1, Tabular array 2.

Figures (if whatever) - General instructions for figures.

  • Include a legend for your images inside the master text, after the reference section
  • Should exist provided every bit separated files during the manuscript submission. Practice not embed images within the primary text.
  • Major prototype formats are accepted excluding BMP. (JPEG, PNG, TIFF)
  • Provide high resolution images, not tiny thumbnails. Image of poor quality will be rejected.
  • The size of the uploaded prototype is limited to 4 MB.
  • Avoid unnecessary large borders on your effigy or image. Click beneath to run across examples of proficient and bad images.

Examples of good and bad image with borders (Click on the images to overstate)
Good Image Good Image

Files must be named with the three letter file extension advisable to the file type (eg: .jpeg, .png). You volition be asked to provide figure labels during the submission process. (The label is the small comment that normally goes with the figure. Example: Figure 1: Prevalence of diabetes in the written report population anile eighteen years and in a higher place. Findings of the TRICARE Diabetes Study, Uganda, 2006.)
If you utilize excel to generate your graph, avoid 3D, crowded axes, colored background, potent grid etc.. Use Tahoma font (size 10 maximum) for all items in your graphs (Title, legend, axes etc..). Expand your Excel graph to obtain a big prototype, copy and paste it in Paint (Microsoft Pigment), crop any white edge and salve the prototype as PNG or JPEG. Submit this image for your manuscript (don't forget to include the legends for each effigy inside the principal manuscript) Look at an acceptable formatted Excel graph here. Come across the detailed sample instructions for a nicely formatted Excel graph here.

Final notes on manuscripts quality

Consult the PAMJ submission checklist to ensure that your submission complies with our basic requirements.

When finalizing your research manuscript, inquire yourself the following questions:

  1. Are your study aims clearly stated and logical?
  2. Is the rationale/justification for conducting the study clear?
  3. Are the methods described in sufficient particular so that the experiment could be reproduced?
  4. Is the study pattern robust and advisable to the stated aim(due south)?
  5. Are the conclusions fatigued supported by the data?
  6. Is the give-and-take department disquisitional and comprehensive?
  7. Are the references advisable in number and upwards-to-date?
  8. Are statements supported accordingly by parenthetical citations?

The STROBE Checklists provide skillful guidance on how to written report observational research well. We strongly suggest that you use them.
Unofficial French versions of some STROBE checklists are available here: STROBE Case-Control Studies | STROBE Cantankerous Exclusive Studies

Download the MS Word version bone the STROBE checklists. Include the completed form as an annex to your submission.

4. Case reports.

Case reports represent an important fraction of paper published in medical journals and are an of import source of learning and experience sharing for clinicians.
The case reports that we will consider for publication should exist:

  • An important clinical lesson
  • Findings that shed new low-cal on the possible pathogenesis of a disease or an adverse consequence
  • Learning from medical errors and back up to medical education
  • Unusual presentation of more common illness/injury
  • Rare illness or new disease
  • New manner to process to diagnose a disease
  • Innovative way to manage a condition/disease in an African setting
  • Unusual clan of diseases/symptoms
  • Unexpected result (positive or negative) including adverse drug reactions

The PAMJ follows the Care guidelines (for Case REports) to support accuracy, transparency, and usefulness of example reports. Authors of instance reports should ensure that their submission follows the Care Check list. An unofficial French version of the CARE check-listing, by the PAMJ, is available.

  1. Title – The diagnosis or intervention of primary focus followed by the words "example report".
  2. Key Words – 2 to 5 fundamental words that identify diagnoses or interventions in this instance study (including "case report").
  3. Abstract – (structured or unstructured)
    • Introduction – What is unique well-nigh this case and what does it add to the scientific literature?
    • The patient's main concerns and important clinical findings.
    • The primary diagnoses, interventions, and outcomes.
    • Conclusion – What are one or more "take-abroad" lessons from this case report?
  4. Introduction – Briefly summarizes why this case is unique and may include medical literature references.
  5. Patient Information
    • De-identified patient specific information.
    • Primary concerns and symptoms of the patient.
    • Medical, family, and psychosocial history including relevant genetic data.
    • Relevant past interventions and their outcomes.
  6. Clinical Findings – Describe pregnant physical exam (PE) and important clinical findings.
  7. Timeline – Historical and current information from this episode of intendance organized every bit a timeline (figure or tabular array).
  8. Diagnostic Assessment
    • Diagnostic methods (PE, laboratory testing, imaging, surveys).
    • Diagnostic challenges.
    • Diagnosis (including other diagnoses considered).
    • Prognostic characteristics when applicative.
  9. Therapeutic Intervention
    • Types of therapeutic intervention (pharmacologic, surgical, preventive).
    • Administration of therapeutic intervention (dosage, force, elapsing).
    • Changes in therapeutic interventions with explanations.
  10. Follow-up and Outcomes
    • Clinician- and patient-assessed outcomes if available.
    • Important follow-upward diagnostic and other test results.
    • Intervention adherence and tolerability. (How was this assessed?)
    • Adverse and unanticipated events.
  11. Discussion
    • Strengths and limitations in your approach to this example.
    • Discussion of the relevant medical literature.
    • The rationale for your conclusions.
    • The master "take-away" lessons from this case written report (without references) in a ane paragraph conclusion.
    • Competing interests: the authors should declare all competing interests
    • Figures (If any) should be included afterward the references. Pictures of patients should follow the journal guidance on preserving patient privacy and confidentiality.
    • References: Should be limited to x
  12. Patient Perspective – The patient should share their perspective on the handling(s) they received.
  13. Informed Consent – The patient should requite informed consent. (Provide if requested.)

The CARE checklist is available for download here: CARE Checklist (In English) . Follow the link to the intendance-statement to see examples of instance reports formatted according to the CARE guidelines. Additional resources for authors are available from the Intendance guidelines authors page. An un-official French version of the CARE checklist is available.

Instance reports will be externally peer reviewed only when their scientific contents are across the capacity of the scientific editors and editorial board team.

Download case report templates to aid formatting your manuscript.

6. Example serial.

A case serial is a group or series of case reports involving patients who were given like handling. Reports of example series usually contain detailed information near the individual patients. This includes demographic information (for example, age, gender, ethnic origin) and information on diagnosis, treatment, response to treatment, and follow-up after handling [Definition of a instance serial]. A case series should include:

  • Abstract: a single cake paragraph of up to 250 words summa rising findings of the serial. Non structured in paragraphs
  • Introduction
  • Methods: describing the method of the case serial, including treatement procedures if any.
  • Results: providing the findings of the series
  • Word: providing the findings of the series
  • Limitations: acknowledging the limitation of your study
  • Conclusion: should highlight the educational aspect of the instance report
  • What is already know on this topic: maximum of 03 bullet points
  • What this study adds: maximum of 03 bullet points
  • Competing interests
  • Authors' contributions: every bit per ICMJE authorship criteria
  • Acknowledgements: (if any)
  • List of tables and/or figures (If whatever): with their detailed legends
  • References: should be limited to 20

Case-series should follow the STROBE guidance for cantankerous-sectional studies.

seven. Images in clinical medicine.

In images in medicine, we publish clinical images of medical conditions, mutual or uncommon. This department also accommodates images of surprising, innovative or uncommon public health situations. We want to capture the visual experience of clinical providers or public health professionals, images they think should be shared with colleagues to enrich their feel or for educational purposes. When submitting images for consideration for publication equally Images in Medicine, ensure the following:

  • The images should be original; (you are the author of the images and the images take not been published somewhere else)
  • The images should exist of high quality: blurred, distorted, pixilated or depression resolution images will not exist accepted.

To submit an image for publication in the PAMJ Images in Medicine section, follow the submission instructions below:

  • Ensure that y'all select "Image in Medicine" every bit manuscript type.
  • All submission should have a title
  • Not more than 2 authors immune for manuscripts submitted in the category Images in Medicine
  • Only one epitome is allow past submission
  • Provide the author names in the order First Name Centre Name (If Any) Terminal Proper name; electronic mail address, Affiliation of all the authors.
  • All images should include an abstract of not more than 250 words, this will also serve as the legend of the image. Enter the abstract in the abstract field during the submission procedure.
  • Provide a short letter to the editors of PAMJ explaining why your images should be published in journal.
  • Upload your prototype as a separate figure, only the formats PNG, JPEG, BMP or TIFF are accepted.
  • Do non include the title of the image or the legend on the figure.
  • Where prompted to upload the manuscript, upload your Microsoft word file, the file should include: The title of the image, the names and affiliations of the authors, the legend of the images (not more 250 words). Include the image in the word certificate.
  • For the image uploaded, we will assume the top of the image as is. If the elevation is in a different location so the image normal top, please utilize an arrow to point the top of the image.
  • You can combine multiple images in a unmarried console. Ensure y'all label the panel accordingly (A, B, C, etc.) in the image legend, employ the console indicator to explain or describe the content of the image panel (see an example of a multi-panels image).
  • For clinical images, the abstract associated should succinctly present relevant clinical information, including a brusque description of the patient'due south history, relevant physical and laboratory findings, clinical course, response to treatment (if any), and status at concluding follow-upwardly; all this in non more than than 250 Words. Besides include: the final diagnosis, and 3 differential diagnosis of the condition. Use the template provided to format your manuscript.

Special instance of photographs of patients

  • If a patient is identifiable in the photo, the patient volition accept to provide is written consent to have his photograph published by signing the PAMJ Release For Photo of Identifiable Patients.
  • Whatever information that can be used to uniquely identify, contact, or locate a single person or tin be used with other sources to uniquely identify a single individual should be remove from the photo. Such information include: such equally patient full names, accost (block, neighborhood, town), national identification number.
  • Any information that might place the patient or hospital, including the engagement, should be removed from the image.

The suitability for publication of the paradigm will be decided by the editorial team or a reviewer expert in the domain. Article processing charges apply to articles published every bit images in medicine.

Clinical images challenge (Image quiz)

The clinical quiz is a drove of images with suggested diagnosis. The images included in the quiz are derived from manuscripts submitted as Images in medicine and Example reports. To contribute to the quiz, ensure that your image or case study includes images suitable for inclusion in the quiz. Provide in add-on to the terminal diagnosis of the condition, three differential diagnosis. The suggested quiz will exist reviewed past 1 of our clinical editor for suitability. If accepted, the quiz will be posted without further notice. Authors of manuscripts included in the quiz will be best-selling in our upcoming Image quiz contributors list.

8. Brusque communication.

A maximum of 1500 words in the main text (i.e. excluding abstract, references and legends) plus up to 10 references and normally no more two illustrations (tables or figures or one of each). Otherwise in the aforementioned format as full-length original papers (see above).

Download short communication templates to help format your manuscripts.

nine. Systematic Reviews, Meta-Analyses Templates.

Contrary to what it seems, review articles are some of the almost challenging to write. Articles submitted to the PAMJ every bit systematic reviews and meta-analyses should adhere to the Preferred Reporting Items for Southwardystematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines.

A maximum of 5000 words in the chief text (i.due east. excluding abstruse, references and legends) plus up to 100 references. Reviews are usually solicited, although unsolicited Reviews may be considered for publication. Prospective writers of Reviews should first consult the Editors.

Several PRISMA extensions exist that we invite prospective authors of reviews to consult and adhere to.

  • PRISMA-P for developing review protocols.
  • PRISMA-IPD (private patient data)
  • PRISMA-NMA (Network Meta-Analyses)

Download review templates to aid format your manuscripts.

In addition, the PRISMA Website provides central documents for authors. Kindly ensure that your review follows these important guidelines

  • PRISMA Checklist
  • PRISMA menstruation diagram
  • The PRISMA Statement

10. Letters to the Editors. Templates.

Annotate briefly on findings of Journal manufactures or other noteworthy public health advances (up to 800 words in main text, no abstruse, express to 10 references). Delight note that word counts refer exclusively to the primary text and practise non include abstract, references, or acknowledgments.

Download letter of the alphabet to the editors templates to assistance format your manuscripts.

eleven. Commentaries

Up to 2500 words in chief text, 2 tables/figures, and an unstructured abstract of 120 words.

Download the commentary template.

12. Essays

Analytical essays provide a forum for critical analyses of public health bug from disciplines other than the biomedical sciences, including (but not express to) the social sciences, human rights, and ideals (up to 3500 words in main text, 4 tables/figures, and an unstructured abstract of 120 words).

Download the Essay template.

13. Case Study

PAMJ approach to case studies is wide. Case studies are used mainly for educational purposes. We broadly distingue three principal types of case written report:

Blazon i: A fictional problem purely for pedagogy purposes.
Type 2: The Analytical Approach examines a situation in order to endeavour and understand the what and why. This approach exercise non necessarily advise solutions to the problem.
Blazon 3: The Trouble-Oriented Method identifies the major problems that exist and advise solutions to these problems.

Depending on the blazon of Case Written report, the following construction is suggested:

  • Title (Required)
  • Abstruse and Keywords (Require)
  • Introduction - Should include the objectives of the case written report (Require)
  • Case study (Require)
  • Give-and-take (Optional)
  • Conclusion (Require)
  • Recommendation (Optional)
  • Implementation (Optional)
  • References (Crave)
  • Additional material (Optional)

Download the Case study paper template.

fourteen. Debate

This is designed to present a forum for critical debate near timely public health topics (up to 1000 words, 10 references). The post-obit structure typically applies to a fence paper: Abstract, Debate, Competing interests, References (not more than 10 references).

Download the debate paper template.

15. Briefs

Report Preliminary or novel findings may be reported as (upwards to 800 words in primary text, two tables/figures, and an abstract of upwards to 80 words). The following construction applies to a cursory: Abstract, Brief, Competing interests, Authors' contributions, Acknowledgments (if whatsoever), Tables and figures (if any, maximum ane table and one figure), References (not more than 15 references).

Download the brief template.

16. Editorial

An editorial is an article written by or on behalf of the editors that gives an opinion on a topical outcome. Editorials are usually solicited. Contact the editorial office if you wish to submit an editorial to the periodical.

The structure of an editorial typically includes:

  • Editorial
  • Competing interests
  • References

Download the editorial template

17. Opinion

An stance piece is a short article providing the personal opinion of the author on a subject area of involvement. Opinion article may be solicited or non. The following structure applies to an opinion piece: Abstruse, Opinion, Competing interests, References (not more than v references). Contact the editorial part if y'all wish to submit an stance slice. Download the opinion template

18. Media sentinel

Media spotter are brief comments on a burning issues recently published in the general media : news papers (online or print), Tv, video, interviews, books etc. Contact the editorial function if you wish to submit a Media Scout.

Download the Media Spotter template

nineteen. Perspective

A perspective essay is an essay where the author is asked to vox their stance on a given topic. The topic chosen to provide a personal perspective about should be of clinical or public wellness interest to PAMJ readership. A perspective should not be based on the opinions of others, but should explicitly express the author's perspective or views. In the process of writing a perspective, the author should assist readers understand how they form their opinion. A perspective is typically a non-technical document, hands understandable to a wide non-technical audition, then avoid using jargon. Use the outset person (I, or we if more than one writer). Use details and examples to illustrate your point.

20. Obituaries

Obituaries acknowledge the work of a significant and recently deceased professional. Contact the editorial office if yous wish to submit an obituary.

21. Outbreak investigation reports

Outbreak investigation report should follow the template provided by the European CDC.

22. Supplements and workshop reports

We welcome conferences sponsored supplements and proceedings. Prospective briefing organizers should contact the editorial office with the projection for specific instructions.

23. Revised manuscripts

If yous are asked to revise your manuscript you will be expected to provide a covering letter that responds in detail to each point raised by reviewers or editors, and to highlight new material in the text using a different color (practise non use the 'track changes' mode of Word). If a manuscript returned to the authors for revision is not returned to the Editorial Office inside the stipulated time-flow (ordinarily four weeks), information technology will exist treated every bit a new manuscript.

24. Proofs

An email is sent to the corresponding author. Typographical errors only should be corrected. The corrected proof should be returned within 48 h. Failure to comply with this deadline volition filibuster publication.

25. Permissions

Verbatim cloth or illustrations taken from other published sources must be accompanied by a written statement from the writer, and from the publisher if holding the copyright, giving permission to PAMJ for reproduction.

26. Copyright

Consult the PAMJ copyright and licensing page.


Publication and peer review processes

Plagiarism cheque

We take the issue of plagiarism very seriously. All manuscripts submitted to the PAMJ are checked for plagiarism various tools and services including Ithenticate (through our partnership with CrossRef), Google search, and contained reports of suspected plagiarism. Suspected and reported instances of plagiarism volition be investigated thoroughly, according to the COPE guidelines. Manuscripts confirmed with plagiarism tin exist removed from consideration for publication in the periodical; actions against all the manuscript authors can also exist considered. If the plagiarism is identified postal service-publication, the commodity can exist retracted with a retraction notice published.

Editorial policies

Whatever manuscript or substantial parts of information technology, submitted to PAMJ must non be under consideration by any other journal. The manuscript should not accept already been published in any journal or other citable form, with that exception that the journal is willing to consider peer-reviewing manuscripts that are translations of articles originally published in another language. In this instance, the consent of the journal in which the commodity was originally published must be obtained and the fact that the article has already been published must exist made clear on submission and stated in the abstruse. Authors who publish in PAMJ retain copyright to their work. Correspondence concerning articles published in PAMJ is encouraged.

Submission of a manuscript to PAMJ implies that all authors have read and agreed to its content, and that any research that is reported in the manuscript has been performed with the approval of an appropriate ethics committee. Enquiry carried out on humans must be in compliance with the Helsinki Declaration, and any experimental enquiry on animals must follow internationally recognized guidelines. A argument to this effect must appear in the Methods section of the manuscript, including the proper name of the body which gave approval, with a reference number where appropriate. Informed consent must also be documented. Manuscripts may be rejected if the editorial role considers that the research has not been carried out inside an ethical framework, e.g. if the severity of the experimental process is non justified past the value of the knowledge gained. View our detailed research policy below.

Generic drug names should mostly be used. When proprietary brands are used in research, include the brand names in parentheses in the Methods section.

We ask authors of PAMJ papers to consummate a announcement of competing interests, which should be provided as a divide department of the manuscript, to follow the Acknowledgements. Where an author gives no competing interests, the listing will read 'The writer(s) declare that they take no competing interests'. To larn more virtually competing interests the post-obit articles provide some background:

  • Morin K, Rakatansky H, Riddick Jr FA, Morse LJ, O'Bannon tertiary JM, Goldrich MS, Ray P, Weiss Chiliad, Sade RM, Spillman MA.Managing conflicts of interest in the conduct of clinical trials. JAMA. 2002 Jan 2;287(1):78-84.
  • DeAngelis CD, Fontanarosa Atomic number 82, Flanagin A. Reporting financial conflicts of involvement and relationships betwixt investigators and research sponsors. JAMA. 2001 Jul iv;286(1):89-91.
  • Smith R. Beyond conflicts of interest. BMJ. 1998; 317 :291. [http://www.bmj.com/content/317/7154/291]
  • Smith R.Making progress with competing interests. BMJ. 2002; 325 :1375. [http://www.bmj.com/content/325/7377/1375]

For all manufactures that include information or clinical photographs relating to individual patients, written and signed consent from each patient to publish must likewise be mailed or faxed to the editorial staff. The manuscript should also include a statement to this event in the Acknowledgements section, every bit follows: "Written consent for publication was obtained from the patient or their relative."

Online submission

1. Requirements

Manuscript are submitted through the PAMJ Manuscript Management Platform (The PAMJ Manuscript Hut). You will need the following to complete the submission of your manuscript:

  • Proper name and e-mail addresses of all authors.
  • Correctly formatted manuscript: Microsoft Discussion (docx only).
  • Correctly formatted figures in i of the acceptable formats (encounter Figures).
  • Embrace letter that explains why the journal should consider your manuscript, declares whatever competing interests and confirms that the manuscript is not currently considered for publication in any other journals.

2. PAMJ reference manner

We strongly encourage authors to utilise a reference software to format references. Output styles for Reference Director and EndNote are provided below. In case these software aren't available, format your references manually.
A sample of the PAMJ reference style below [ane,two].

  1. Kirikou Thomas, Doe John, Shaba Kevin, Kashawa Tuma. A sample of the PAMJ reference way as shown on the journal website. J Hist Fant. 2006; 76(11):204-212
  2. Kirikou Thomas, Doe John, Shaba Kevin, Kashawa Tuma. Some other sample of the PAMJ reference style: every bit shown on the journal website. J Hist Fant. 2006; 76(12):212-228

Download journal output style for Reference Manager
Download journal output mode for EndNote
Download journal output fashion for Zotero

Access the online Manuscript Submission Arrangement.

Commodity Processing Charges

To maintain its Open up Admission business organisation model, the PAMJ charges an Article Processing Fee (APF) of $180 US per manuscripts accustomed for publication in the journal. AFP are requested simply if the manuscript is accepted for publication. Authors are expected to pay APF within 30 days of acceptance of the manuscript; passed this filibuster, the article may be rejected for non-payment of Article Processing Charges. Nosotros exercise not charge article submission fees. Authors or research sponsors are responsible for the payment of the APF. Authors who are covered through i of our Institutional Members are eligible for a discount or waiver of this fee. We strongly encourage authors to assess their capacity to cover the APF earlier submitting their manuscript for publication to PAMJ.

Authors tin request partial or complete waiver during the submission process. Waivers are subjected to thorough investigation and are rarely granted, considering that the corporeality charged is already very low and barely cover the cost of publishing a manuscript.

For more on PAMJ article processing charges, consult our contact the PAMJ sales office at sales-service@panafrican-med-journal.com.

PAMJ peer review process

PAMJ uses online peer review (The PAMJ Manuscript Hut) to speed up the publication process. Submitted manuscripts, where applicable, will be sent to peer reviewers, unless they are either out of scope or below the language or scientific threshold for the journal as determined past a managing editor, a science editor or an associate editor.

The PAMJ follow a single blind peer review process whereby, reviewers know who the authors of the manuscripts are but authors exercise not know who the reviewers are.

Manuscripts submitted to the PAMJ will go through three type of review process:

  1. Internal review of the format and adherence to the journal instructions for authors: during this footstep, the editor in charge of the manuscript will assess the submission'southward adherence to the journal instructions for authors including the quality of the images and tables, the format of citations and references of the manuscript. The editors in charge of the manuscript may reject the manuscript at this phase if the issues identified are numerous or request the submission of a revision if the issues identified are minor.
  2. Internal scientific review by the PAMJ scientific editors: at this phase, scientific editors or qualified members of the editorial board will assess the scientific contents of the manuscript; focusing on all aspects of the manuscript including adherence to reporting guideline such every bit STROBE, PRISMA, Consort, CARE, sound science, adherence to upstanding guidelines and compliance with the PAMJ editorial policy. Depending on the effect of this internal scientific review, the scientific editors may recommend revisions, rejection, or accept the manuscript. Manuscript submitted in the categories: Case report, Images in clinical medicine, Messages to the editors, Comments, Opinions are usually non sent out for external peer-review.
  3. External peer review: Each manuscript is sent to two to iii external peer reviewers. The decision to ship the manuscript for external review is made on its clinical, policy or public health relevance. The external peer review does non preclude an internal 1 as the two can be conducted concomitantly. The decision on the manuscript will be based on the outcome of the combined peer review processed (internal and external). All manuscripts submitted in as Research, Reviews, Essay are internally and externally peer reviewed.

The ultimate responsibleness for any conclusion lies with the Editor-in-Primary, to whom any appeals against rejections should be addressed.

Suggesting peer reviewers

Authors are allowed to recommend 3 qualified reviewers for the peer review process. Adhering to the following guidelines volition help you identify peer-reviewers for your manuscript:

  • Provide the first and last names, institutions, and e-mail addresses of the proposed reviewers.
  • Potential reviewers should non exist from any of the authors' institutions.
  • Reviewers should exist as various equally possible, from various countries and/or institutions. Do non propose two reviewers from the same institution.
  • Exercise not propose members of the periodical's Informational Board or the journal's editorial staff.
  • Do not recommend reviewers that have a real or perceived conflict of interest (for example: a collaborator or someone who has recently published with 1 of the authors, a friend, a colleague from the same institution, a family unit member, a funder of the study, etc..).
  • The reviewers should have proven and documented expertise in the field of study, with publications searchable on PubMed.

The editorial office reserves the right to invite or non the recommended reviewers. The editorial office will likewise ensure that the recommended reviewers adhere to the guidelines above.

To guide the peer-review process, the PAMJ provides a checklist adapted from the Review Criteria for Research Manuscripts 2nd Edition (AAMC). the Reviewers are asked whether the manuscript is scientifically sound and coherent, how interesting it is and whether the quality of the writing is acceptable. Where possible, the concluding decision is made on the footing that the peer reviewers are in accord with one another, or that at least there is no strong dissenting view. In cases where there is stiff disagreement either among peer reviewers or betwixt the authors and peer reviewers, communication is sought from a member of the periodical's Editorial Board. The journal allows a maximum of two revisions of any manuscripts.

Reviewers are also asked to indicate which manufactures they consider to exist particularly interesting or significant. These articles may exist given greater prominence and greater external publicity.

Check our reviewers page for more about the journal peer review process and how we advantage peer reviewers.

PAMJ record retentiveness policy (CrossMark Policy)

Fabric and records created during the submission process volition be archived. Once archived, these cloth will no longer be accessible to the submitting author through the journal panel. The duration of retentivity of records created during the submission procedure is as follow:

  • Manuscripts already published: 2 years from the engagement of publication
  • Manuscripts rejected or withdrawn: ii years from the date of the action

Authors willing to admission these material would have to contact the editorial part of the periodical.

Nosotros work closely with authors to make what we publish mistake-free.

When an article is published, the corresponding author receives an email and a correction request sheet which can be used to submit corrections to our online proof checking system if necessary. In each instance, we make sure that corrections are handled as presently as possible.

All corrections are handled by the editor assigned to the commodity.

All other changes requested will be reviewed by the editorial team for appropriateness.

We publish corrections in Erratum and Blunder manufactures as soon as we can.

Once a manuscript is published, authors can request changes for; grammatical and orthographic errors, errors in the spelling of writer names or affiliation, invalid or non-readable characters.

After a manuscript is published, PAMJ editors will not accept requests to change the guild of authors, add new authors or remove authors.

Requests to make intensive changes anywhere in the text will be declined.

PAMJ retraction policy

Retractions are considered by the PAMJ editorial office subsequently assessing evidence of unreliable data or findings, plagiarism, duplicate publication, and unethical enquiry practices.

The PAMJ editorial office may consider an expression of business organisation notice if an commodity is under investigation.

When a retraction discover is published in PAMJ, the retracted commodity and the PDF are watermarked with "retracted article" earlier the discover is submitted for indexation on PubMed and other article databases where PAMJ content is deposited

Depending on the nature of the retraction, authors may as well be banned from publishing in PAMJ for up to five (5) years.

PAMJ correction policy

The PAMJ is a member of the Committee on Publication Ideals (COPE) and follows the International standards for editors and authors [i] and COPE guidelines on investigating scientific misconduct.

CrossMark is a multi-publisher initiative from Crossref to provide a standard way for readers to locate the current version of a piece of content. By applying the Crossmark logo Publisher Name is committing to maintaining the content information technology publishes and to alerting readers to changes if and when they occur. Clicking on the Crossmark logo will tell you the current condition of a document and may also give you additional publication record data about the certificate.

PAMJ participates in CrossMark, therefore, all published articles will display the CrossMark logo similar to the 1 below. By Clicking on the CrossMark logo you will go the current status of an article and will be directed to the latest published version.

  1. Kleinert Due south & Wager E (2011) Responsible research publication: international standards for editors. A position statement developed at the 2nd World Briefing on Inquiry Integrity, Singapore, July 22-24, 2010. Chapter 51 in: Mayer T &Steneck N (eds) Promoting Research Integrity in a Global Environment. Imperial College Printing / Globe Scientific Publishing, Singapore (pp 317-28). (ISBN 978-981-4340-97-7)

CrossMark Logo

Permanent archiving of content

All articles published in PAMJ receive a DOI. The contents of PAMJ is archived on Africa Journal Online, PubMed Fundamental

Whenever a published article needs to be corrected, the correction or retraction policies above volition utilize.

Authors conflicts and complaints resolution

Conflicts and disagreements between authors themselves or between authors and the editorial squad are inevitable. All conflicts volition be handled according to the Committee on Publication Ethics Guidance. Authors are free to bring their grievance against the periodical to COPE. As a fellow member of the COPE, some issues betwixt authors or betwixt authors and the journal can be posted on COPE website as case studies, in accord with COPE editorial policies.

PAMJ Research Ethics Policy

All research manufactures submitted for consideration to the PAMJ -COM should abide to basic research ideals as guided by international bodies such equally:

  • Standards and Operational Guidance for Ethics Review of Health-Related Research with Human being Participants
  • International ethical guidelines for biomedical research involving human subjects
  • The International Ethical Guidelines for Epidemiological Studies
  • The International ethical guidelines for epidemiological studies
  • The Nuffield Council: The ethics of research related to healthcare in developing countries

The bones principles underpinning the ethical conduct at all stages of research are summarized beneath:

  • Researchers must abide with the following principles at all stages of the research lifecycle. This includes the planning phase, applying for funding, the conduct, and later stages of the project, such every bit dissemination and impact activities.
  • Researchers must respect the rights, interests, dignity of participants and related persons in research.
  • Enquiry must exist undertaken in accordance with any relevant common constabulary or legislation.
  • Total informed consent should normally be obtained from participants to enable participants to take part voluntarily. Consent should be given freely without force or coercion.
  • Researchers have an obligation to protect enquiry participants wherever possible from significant damage consequent upon the research.
  • The confidentiality of information supplied by enquiry participants and any agreement to grant anonymity to respondents should be respected.
  • Care must be taken with collecting, treatment and storing sensitive, classified and/or personal data. Such data should be kept securely and protected from unauthorized access.
  • Particular care should be taken to ensure that human data cannot be linked back to individuals unless by authorised persons. It is essential that all sensitive, classified and /or personal data are disposed of appropriately in line with legal and funder requirements.
  • Both the design of enquiry and its carry should ensure integrity, quality and provide benefits that outweigh potential risk or harm.
  • Research shall be undertaken subject to the principle of academic independence. Where any conflicts of interest or partiality arise, these must be conspicuously stated prior to upstanding approval being obtained.
  • The same loftier ethical standards shall apply wherever in the world the research is being undertaken.
  • The principal investigator and the inquiry team shall be responsible for determining what ethical bug emerge from the proposed project and for obtaining ethical blessing of the project.
  • All research involving human participants is subject to ethical approval.
  • Inquiry that does not involve humans merely raises ethical issues or concerns is besides subject to ethical approval
  • Researchers are responsible for ensuring the project is undertaken equally approved by the University enquiry ethics approval process and in compliance with any legal or organisational requirements.
  • Any major divergence from the canonical project must be subject to further ethical approval and the researcher is responsible for acquiring further ethics approval earlier standing with the research.

lambertbutcheall.blogspot.com

Source: https://www.panafrican-med-journal.com/view/content.php?item=ifa

Postar um comentário for "After the Amanuscript Traking Sysyem Shows Reviews Completed It Says Under Revew Again"